Case 3301946/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Barbosa Dethling v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis — 2024
- Case reference
- 3301946/2023
- Decision date
- 3 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Barbosa Dethling
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered the respondent's application at a preliminary hearing and dismissed four complaints because it held that the employment tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider them. The unfair dismissal complaint was treated as not withdrawn, but the tribunal held that s.200 ERA precluded the claim by a police officer because the exceptions for health and safety or protected disclosure dismissal were not part of the claim.
The tribunal held that a freestanding Protection from Harassment Act 1997 claim could not be pursued in the employment tribunal, and that a breach of duty of care leading to personal injury was a matter for the county court or High Court. It also held that alleged breaches of the Police Performance or Conduct Regulations were not freestanding causes of action within the tribunal's jurisdiction.
The judgment expressly preserved the claimant's ability to rely on alleged breaches of the Performance or Conduct Regulations where relevant to Equality Act complaints, including alleged detriment connected with those regulations, and noted that personal injury could potentially be compensated if the claimant succeeded on other complaints.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction under s.200 ERA to consider an unfair dismissal complaint by a police officer in the circumstances of this case. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | This was a freestanding claim under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, dismissed because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Freestanding complaint of breach of duty of care leading to personal injury, dismissed because the tribunal held it could only be brought in the county court or High Court. The judgment stated this did not prevent compensation for injury if the claimant succeeded on other complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Freestanding complaint under the Police (Performance) Regulations 2020 and/or Police Conduct Regulations 2020, dismissed because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction over such a cause of action. The judgment stated the claimant could still rely on alleged breaches if relevant to Equality Act issues. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.94 ERA
- s.95 ERA
- s.200 ERA
- s.3 PHA
- s.120 EQA
- s.15 EQA
- Majrowski v Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust
- Irwell Insurance Company Ltd v Watson
- P v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.