Case 3302020/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Ms R King v WKCIC Group t/a Capital City College Group — 2023

Case reference: 3302020/2023
Decision date: 3 December 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Caiden Appearances
Venue: Watford

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms R King

Respondent

WKCIC Group t/a Capital City College Group

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

On 13 October 2023, Employment Judge Caiden heard Ms R King's claims against WKCIC Group t/a Capital City College Group. The tribunal held that Ms King was not a "fixed-term employee" within the meaning of reg.1(2) of the Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Fixed-term employee regulations	Tribunal found the claimant was not a fixed-term employee within reg.1(2) because she was employed on a contract of indefinite duration with continuity of employment since 3 September 2018; the reg.3 claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.	Dismissed	—	—
Fixed-term employee regulations	The claim for the right to receive a written statement for less favourable treatment under reg.5 was dismissed because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction, having found the claimant was not a fixed-term employee.	Dismissed	—	—
Fixed-term employee regulations	The claim for the right to receive a written statement of variations under reg.9 was dismissed because the tribunal held the claimant was not a fixed-term employee within reg.1(2).	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.