Case 3302157/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Cardoso v Servest Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302157/2020
- Decision date
- 15 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Cardoso
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Cardoso brought proceedings against Servest Limited under case number 3302157/2020. The tribunal did not determine any substantive issues in the claim. Instead, the judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
Because the claim was withdrawn, the judgment contains no findings on liability, no legal analysis of the pleaded causes of action, and no award of compensation or other remedy. The record is limited to the formal dismissal order dated 15 April 2020, sent to the parties on 15 June 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no merits determination was made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no merits determination was made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no merits determination was made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.