Case 3302311/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Simon Perhar, of counsel For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302311/2018
- Decision date
- 12 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Members
- Venue
- Aylesbury
- Panel members
- Ms J Beard, Mr N Boustred
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Simon Perhar, of counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Aylesbury, the tribunal heard Ms J Jenkins' claims against British Airways plc in case numbers 3302311/2018, 3333832/2018 and 3320187/2019 on 5-9 October 2020. The tribunal was constituted by Employment Judge Hyams with Ms J Beard and Mr N Boustred sitting as members.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims of breaches of sections 15, 20, 26 and 27 of the Equality Act 2010, read with section 39, failed and were dismissed. No separate findings, reasons, or compensatory award are set out in the extracted text.
The only outcome recorded in the judgment is dismissal of the Equality Act claims. No remedy is awarded and no monetary figure appears in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claim under section 15 Equality Act 2010, read with section 39. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claim under section 20 Equality Act 2010, read with section 39. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment dismisses the claim under section 26 Equality Act 2010, read with section 39. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment dismisses the claim under section 27 Equality Act 2010, read with section 39; the extracted text does not identify a separate protected characteristic for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.