Case 3302317/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Marshall Eaton Holdings Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302317/2023
- Decision date
- 30 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. Those deductions consisted of non-payment of wages at £6,250 per month for November 2022, December 2022 and January 2023.
The tribunal also found that £146.76 was deducted on a monthly basis in August, September and October 2022 for pension payments that were not made to the claimant's pension provider. Judgment was therefore entered for the claimant in the total sum of £19,190.28.
The respondent's counterclaim in the sum of £717.97 was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions consisting of unpaid wages of £6,250 per month for November 2022, December 2022 and January 2023, plus monthly deductions of £146.76 for August, September and October 2022 for pension payments not made to the pension provider. The respondent's counterclaim for £717.97 was dismissed. | Upheld | — | £19,190 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,190
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.