Case 3302351/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Snow v Marshall Eaton Holdings Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3302351/2023
- Decision date
- 28 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Snow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made under Rule 21. The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded, and that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in November 2022, December 2022 and January 2023.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £12,840 as a net sum, and a further £290 for financial loss attributable to the unauthorised deductions. The tribunal stated that it did not have power to make any additional award as compensation for stress.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprises £12,840 net wages and £290 financial loss attributable to the unauthorised deductions. The tribunal stated it had no power to make any additional award for stress. | Upheld | — | £13,130 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,130
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure – Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.