Case 3302425/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented For the v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302425/2022
- Decision date
- 15 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made by consent on the papers, with the parties agreeing that the matter could be resolved in light of admissions made by the respondent. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal awarded £2,830.71 for unfair dismissal. It stated that the claimant's basic award had been satisfied by his redundancy payment, and that the agreed compensatory award was £2,830.71 with no recoupment provisions applying.
The tribunal also recorded that the respondent failed to carry out the appropriate collective consultation required by the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The agreed protective award was £12,969.35, producing a total sum payable of £15,800.06.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment by consent states the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The basic award was satisfied by his redundancy payment; the agreed compensatory award was £2,830.71 and recoupment did not apply. | Upheld | — | £2,831 |
| Other | Judgment by consent states the respondent failed to carry out the appropriate collective consultation required by the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The agreed protective award was £12,969.35. | Upheld | — | £12,969 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,800
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,831
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.