Case 3302571/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v All Energy Solutions Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302571/2023
- Decision date
- 27 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich on 1 December 2023 before Employment Judge Postle. The claimant, Mr M Goodman, appeared in person. The respondent, All Energy Solutions Limited, had not entered a response and did not attend.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s claim for a redundancy payment and ordered £4,575.00. It also found the respondents were in breach of contract and awarded damages for five weeks in the sum of £2,335.95.
The tribunal further upheld the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction of wages, recording that the deduction covered 14 weeks from 21 October 2022 to 27 January 2023, and ordered payment of £6,385.66. In addition, the tribunal found the claimant had 10 days of accrued untaken and unpaid holiday and ordered £665.50. The total award was therefore £13,962.11.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal ordered a redundancy payment of £4,575.00. | Upheld | — | £4,575 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondents were in breach of contract and ordered damages for 5 weeks in the sum of £2,335.95. | Upheld | — | £2,336 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction of wages covering 14 weeks from 21 October 2022 to 27 January 2023 and ordered payment of £6,385.66. | Upheld | — | £6,386 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had accrued untaken and unpaid holiday of 10 days and ordered payment of £665.50. | Upheld | — | £666 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,962
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.