Case 3302620/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Darren Windsor v North Star Community Trust Ltd and 3 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302620/2022
- Decision date
- 14 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mrs P Barratt, Mrs J Hancock
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr Darren Windsor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was employed as a teacher and brought consolidated claims including disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment related to disability and unfair dismissal. It upheld three disability-related issues against the first respondent: failure to respond to a request to share departmental equipment, not sharing departmental equipment, and the 22 October 2021 letter stating there was no evidence on file regarding a disability.
All remaining claims of discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment and unfair dismissal against all respondents were dismissed. The claim for personal injury compensation was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal found that the three successful issues were out of time but formed a course of conduct concerning the claimant requesting and being denied reasonable adjustments. It held that the last act was 14 days out of time and that it was just and equitable to extend time.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010 succeeded only for failing to respond to a request to share departmental equipment, issue 50.2, against the first respondent; remaining s.15 allegations were dismissed. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss.20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 succeeded only for not sharing departmental equipment, issue 52.1.a, against the first respondent; remaining reasonable adjustment allegations were dismissed. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability under s.26 Equality Act 2010 succeeded only in relation to the 22 October 2021 letter stating there was no evidence on file regarding a disability, issue 54.3, against the first respondent; remaining harassment allegations were dismissed. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim for personal injury compensation was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.123(3) Equality Act 2010
- s.123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- section 15(1) Equality Act 2010
- ss.20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.