Case 3302738/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A B Soares v Primark Stores Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302738/2024
- Decision date
- 29 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A B Soares
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that Mr A B Soares's claims against Primark Stores Ltd were struck out. The matter was heard at Reading on 16 April 2025 before Employment Judge Anstis, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr J Allsop, counsel.
The gov.uk listing categories supplied for this case identify the claims as breach of contract, disability discrimination, race discrimination, unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. The written judgment does not set out separate reasons for each claim, record any findings on liability, or make any remedy award. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claims are struck out; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in Layer 1. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claims are struck out; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in Layer 1. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claims are struck out; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in Layer 1. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claims are struck out; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in Layer 1. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claims are struck out; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in Layer 1. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.