Case 3302862/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr N Hanafy v Metroline Travel Limited — 2022

Case reference: 3302862/2018
Decision date: 26 July 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Maxwell
Venue: Watford
Panel members: Mrs L Thompson, Mr S Woodward

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr N Hanafy

Respondent

Metroline Travel Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal dismissed the Claimant's claim of unfair dismissal, finding it was not well founded. It also dismissed the discrimination complaints relating to age and disability, including direct discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, indirect discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and harassment related to disability or age.

The tribunal further dismissed the victimisation claim as not well founded. The only successful claim recorded in the judgment was the claim of unlawful deductions, which was found well-founded and succeeded. The judgment does not set out reasons or any monetary remedy in the supplied text.

Claims and outcomes

6 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and was dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—
Age discrimination	The judgment dismisses direct age discrimination and indirect age discrimination claims, and harassment related to age. It also uses the phrase 'direct age discrimination because of disability or age', which appears unclear in the extracted text.	Dismissed	Age	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment dismisses direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, indirect disability discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Harassment	The judgment states the claim of harassment related to disability or age was not well founded and was dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—
Victimisation	The judgment states the victimisation claim was not well founded and was dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment states the unlawful deductions claim was well-founded and succeeds, but gives no remedy figure.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.