The respondent operated a restaurant where the ten claimants worked in various roles. All claimants were dismissed without notice by a letter dated 31 January 2024 citing significant financial difficulties. The respondent had indicated in its ET3 response that it did not contest any part of the claims and did not attend the hearing, having written on 9 January 2025 to say it was in a difficult financial position. Employment Judge Dick proceeded to determine the claims under what was then rule 21 (now rule 22).
The Tribunal found that every claimant had well-founded claims for statutory notice pay as damages for breach of contract, and that those who had been employed for more than two years were entitled to statutory redundancy payments under section 163 ERA 1996. None of the claimants were paid wages for January 2024, giving each a well-founded claim for unauthorised deduction of wages, and some had received less than they were due for December 2023. The Tribunal also upheld unauthorised deduction claims relating to unpaid tronc (tips) between November 2023 and January 2024, accepting evidence on oath from Mr Baiano (the former restaurant manager) about how tronc was collected and distributed.
Mr Marek's unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal after he clarified he only sought notice pay, redundancy pay and arrears. The Judge refused Mr Rae's late application to amend to add a holiday pay claim on the basis the respondent had not had notice of it, but allowed amendments to add tronc and expenses claims for some claimants on the basis the respondent would suffer no material prejudice. Awards for expenses (claimants 7, 9 and 10) were upheld on evidence that the written contract provided for reimbursement on production of receipts, which had been provided.