Case 3303038/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3303038/2023
- Decision date
- 14 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr D Bean, Mr W Dykes
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of direct discrimination based on race and religion. It held that the direct discrimination complaint arising from the 3 April 2022 altercation was presented outside the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. It also found the direct discrimination complaints were not well-founded.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaints of harassment related to race and age as not well-founded, and dismissed the breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay. Those claims did not succeed on the facts found by the tribunal.
The holiday pay complaint was upheld. The tribunal found that the respondent had breached contract by failing to pay for holidays accrued but untaken at the end of employment, and it quantified the accrued holidays at £937.36. That sum was offset against a salary overpayment in December 2022, and the tribunal recorded that no further payment was due from the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held that the direct race discrimination complaint concerning the 3 April 2022 altercation was presented out of time, that it was not just and equitable to extend time, and that the complaint was not well-founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The tribunal held that the direct religion discrimination complaint concerning the 3 April 2022 altercation was presented out of time, that it was not just and equitable to extend time, and that the complaint was not well-founded. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | The complaint of harassment related to race was found not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The complaint of harassment related to age was found not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay was found not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay complaint succeeded. The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay for holidays accrued but untaken when employment ended, quantified the accrued holidays at £937.36, and then offset that sum against a December 2022 salary overpayment so that no further payment was due. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.