Case 3303042/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Pickard v Marshall Motor Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3303042/2023
- Decision date
- 25 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Pickard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal refused the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims. The application had been made on the basis of alleged unreasonable manner of conducting the proceedings, non-compliance with a tribunal order, or failure to actively pursue the claims.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claims and makes no award of compensation or other monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only that the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims was refused. It does not determine the substantive unfair dismissal claim. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims was refused. It does not determine the substantive unlawful deduction from wages claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.