Case 3303213/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hussain v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police — 2023
- Case reference
- 3303213/2021
- Decision date
- 25 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr C Surrey, Mr A Scott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public hearing in Watford on 12, 14, 15, 18 and 19 September 2023 before Employment Judge Quill, with Mr C Surrey and Mr A Scott sitting as members, the Tribunal dealt with the claimant's complaints against the Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police. It held that the complaints based on allegations at items (e) and (f) of the list of issues had been presented out of time and dismissed them because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | All complaints based on allegations at items (e) and (f) of the list of issues were found to have been presented out of time and were dismissed because the Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction. The extracted text does not identify the underlying legal label or protected characteristic for those allegations. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to religion, based on allegations at items (g) to (k) of the list of issues, was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race, based on allegations at items (g) to (k) of the list of issues, was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Discrimination because of religion, based on allegations at items (g) to (k) of the list of issues, was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Race discrimination | Discrimination because of race, based on allegations at items (g) to (k) of the list of issues, was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.