Case 3303366/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Bowers v Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303366/2024
- Decision date
- 23 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Bowers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 23 July 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr Bowers an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out. The stated grounds were that the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner, that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 4 December 2024, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Bowers did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No remedy was recorded because the case was disposed of on strike-out grounds rather than on the merits. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Quill on 18 September 2025 and sent to the parties on 23 September 2025.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment does not list the individual heads of claim; this classification follows the case listing category. The proceedings were struck out as a whole. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not list the individual heads of claim; this classification follows the case listing category. The proceedings were struck out as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not list the individual heads of claim; this classification follows the case listing category. The proceedings were struck out as a whole. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment does not list the individual heads of claim; this classification follows the case listing category. The proceedings were struck out as a whole. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not list the individual heads of claim; this classification follows the case listing category. The proceedings were struck out as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.