Case 3303451/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Nigel Langford v Keeping Kids Company (in compulsory liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3303451/2015
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Nigel Langford
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded a single procedural judgment in the claim brought by Nigel Langford against Keeping Kids Company (in compulsory liquidation) and The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation & Skills. It stated that the claim was struck out.
The reason given was that, by a letter dated 24 July 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The judgment therefore struck out the claim.
The judgment did not identify the substantive heads of claim, did not record any liability findings on those heads, and did not make any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause or causes of action. It records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.