Case 3303551/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A. Liaquat v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303551/2020
- Decision date
- 26 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A. Liaquat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 12 March 2021, the Claimant confirmed that he did not pursue claims of direct discrimination because of race, marital status or disability, indirect discrimination related to race or marital status, harassment related to race or marital status, unpaid wages, and defamation. The tribunal dismissed those claims on withdrawal by the Claimant.
The judgment records that the claims proceeding to a full hearing were unfair dismissal, indirect discrimination related to disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment related to disability, and victimisation. The judgment does not decide the merits of those proceeding claims and records no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
11 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct discrimination because of race and indirect discrimination related to race were not pursued and were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | Direct discrimination because of marital status and indirect discrimination related to marital status were not pursued and were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination because of disability was not pursued and was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race was not pursued and was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to marital status was not pursued and was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unpaid wages claim was not pursued and was dismissed on withdrawal. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.