Case 3303669/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v In person. — 2020
- Case reference
- 3303669/2019
- Decision date
- 15 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant satisfied the definition of redundancy under s.139 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that the requirements of the respondent's business for employees to carry out work of a particular kind had ceased or diminished, or were expected to cease or diminish.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy within s.135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent was ordered to pay a redundancy payment of £8,751.96.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant satisfied the statutory definition of redundancy under s.139 Employment Rights Act 1996 and that he had been dismissed by reason of redundancy under s.135. | Upheld | — | £8,752 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,752
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.139 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.135 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.