Case 3303916/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For v Non-attendance — 2024
- Case reference
- 3303916/2023
- Decision date
- 21 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Douse
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case came before Employment Judge Douse, sitting alone at Cambridge Tribunal via CVP on 1 July 2024, as a remedy hearing although no judgment had yet been issued. The Respondent did not attend and had filed no response. The Judge was satisfied that a determination could properly be made on the claim for a redundancy payment, and ordered the Respondent to pay £11,328.48 gross, calculated as 8 years at 1.5 weeks and 12 years at 1 week at £474.27 per week.
The Judge was not satisfied that a determination could properly be made on the unfair dismissal claim on the available material. The Claimant's case was that the Respondent had said everyone was being made redundant but a number of people continued to work there after his termination, so the dismissal was not for redundancy. The Judge identified difficulties with the screenshots, message extracts and photographs provided, including the absence of the Respondent's Facebook account details, missing dates, references to first names only, and no means of identifying individuals or confirming they were not new employees.
The Judge offered the Claimant the opportunity to provide further evidence including a witness statement, or to take advice on the merits before deciding whether to continue. After a break in which the Claimant was joined by Ms Louise Hyde, he decided to conclude matters that day and withdrew his unfair dismissal claim, which was accordingly dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant at the hearing after the Judge explained evidential difficulties with the screenshots and photographs relied upon. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment of £11,328.48 gross ordered. Schedule: 8 years at 1.5 weeks x £474.27 plus 12 years at 1 week x £474.27. | Upheld | — | £11,328 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,328
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.