Case 3304119/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. A Mereuta v John Lewis plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304119/2020
- Decision date
- 4 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. A.
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Mr. A. Hayes, Mr. S. Holford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. A Mereuta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Cambridge with Employment Judge Mr A Spencer and two non-legal members, unanimously decided that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed by John Lewis plc.
The tribunal also unanimously decided that the respondent did not unlawfully discriminate against the claimant because of pregnancy or maternity. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. Written reasons were not included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records that the respondent did not unlawfully discriminate against the claimant because of pregnancy or maternity. Written reasons were not included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.