Case 3304151/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Earlington v Slough Children’s Services Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 3304151/2019
- Decision date
- 8 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Earlington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal record. It states that the proceedings in case 3304151/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by Ms M Earlington. Employment Judge Smail dated the judgment 1 June 2020, and it was sent to the parties on 8 July 2020.
The judgment does not set out the underlying issues, evidence, findings on liability, or any remedy. No monetary award or legal test is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the case listing because the judgment text does not set out individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the case listing because the judgment text does not set out individual claims. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the case listing because the judgment text does not set out individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.