Case 3304216/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Tuia v Lidl Great Britain Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304216/2023
- Decision date
- 26 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Tuia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 18 July 2024 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's Order dated 21 May 2024 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing, and the claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim is struck out and does not particularise individual heads of claim; this classification follows the supplied gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim is struck out and does not particularise individual heads of claim; this classification follows the supplied gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim is struck out and does not particularise individual heads of claim; this classification follows the supplied gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.