Case 3304223/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Thomas v AC Care Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304223/2022
- Decision date
- 26 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Thomas issued her claim in the South East Employment Tribunals on 4 April 2022. The respondent, AC Care Services Limited, failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge George Date made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awarded her £1,584.40. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £485.45, giving an immediate total award of £2,069.85.
The claims in respect of unpaid statutory maternity pay and maternity discrimination also succeeded, but no figure was fixed in this judgment. The remedy for those claims was left to be determined at a Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £1,584 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £485 |
| Other | Unpaid statutory maternity pay; remedy to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Maternity discrimination succeeded; remedy to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,070
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.