Case 3304224/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Hyginus Eze v West London NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304224/2022
- Decision date
- 25 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Representation
- Venue
- Watford Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Hyginus Eze
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Hyginus Eze brought claims against West London NHS Trust for unfair dismissal, underpayment or non-payment of wages, and direct race discrimination. The tribunal did not determine the merits of those complaints because it found that each was presented out of time. For the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal held that it was outside the time limit in s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996 and that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within the appropriate time limit.
The tribunal made the same limitation finding in relation to the wages complaint under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996, holding that it was presented outside the time limit in s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996 and that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought in time. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the wages complaint.
The race discrimination complaints were also held to be out of time. The tribunal found that the direct race discrimination complaints under s.13 Equality Act 2010 were presented outside the time limit in s.123 Equality Act 2010 and that it was not just and equitable to allow them to proceed. The tribunal therefore dismissed the proceedings in full.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal held it was presented outside the s.111 time limit and that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for underpayment or non-payment of wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal held it was presented outside the s.23 time limit and that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Complaints of direct race discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal held they were presented outside the s.123 time limit and that it was not just and equitable to allow them to proceed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.