Case 3304232/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3304232/2024
- Decision date
- 21 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints described as unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, bullying and harassment. The judgment records that she was still employed by the First Respondent and that the complaints appeared to concern matters including extension of her probation period, a disciplinary investigation, and the handling of her grievance.
The Tribunal had ordered the claimant to provide further particulars of her claims and information and records relevant to disability. After revised deadlines and warnings that non-compliance could lead to strike out, the claimant did not comply with the orders or respond to the Tribunal and the Respondents as required.
The Tribunal considered the claimant's submissions about stress, anxiety and neuro-divergent disabilities, but found there was no basis for believing she would, or would be able to, comply with further orders. It concluded that a lesser sanction was not appropriate and struck out the claim in its entirety under rule 38(1)(c).
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant remained employed. The claim was struck out in its entirety under rule 38(1)(c) for non-compliance with Tribunal orders. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant relied on neurodiversity, autism, ADHD, pain and fatigue. The claim was struck out in its entirety under rule 38(1)(c) for non-compliance with Tribunal orders. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records a claim for bullying and harassment, apparently in the context of disability discrimination. The claim was struck out in its entirety; the supplied PDF text was truncated. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 38(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- rule 40 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.