Case 3304235/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Esther Wildschut v Marshall Eaton Holdings Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3304235/2020
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Esther Wildschut
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not set out findings on the merits or identify the underlying legal claims.
No remedy was awarded or addressed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, but does not identify the underlying claim type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.