Case 3304258/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hasan v East London NHS Foundation Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304258/2023
- Decision date
- 20 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Hasan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records a preliminary jurisdictional decision rather than a merits determination. Employment Judge Bansal, sitting alone at Watford on 27 October 2023, held that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to deal with the claimant's claims of discrimination, harassment and victimisation.
As a result, those claims were dismissed. The written judgment does not set out the underlying facts, identify the particular discrimination heads, or give written reasons beyond noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing unless requested in writing within the relevant period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to deal with 'the claims of discrimination' but does not specify the discrimination heads or protected characteristics in the text provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed because the Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to deal with the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Dismissed because the Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to deal with the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.