Case 3304281/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Adams v John Lewis plc and 3 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304281/2020
- Decision date
- 9 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Panel members
- Ms F Betts, Mr A Kapur
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr J Adams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims against the second respondent on withdrawal. It dismissed the claimant's claims against the first, third and fourth respondents.
The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing. It also ordered the claimant to pay the respondents legal costs of £2,000, specifying that this was a single figure and not £2,000 for each respondent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The gov.uk listing category identifies age discrimination. The judgment itself records only that the claims against the first, third and fourth respondents were dismissed and that the claims against the second respondent were dismissed on withdrawal; it does not set out separate reasoning or outcomes by claim type. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | The gov.uk listing category identifies sex discrimination. The judgment itself records only that the claims against the first, third and fourth respondents were dismissed and that the claims against the second respondent were dismissed on withdrawal; it does not set out separate reasoning or outcomes by claim type. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.