Case 3304364/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Kaggwa v Telent Technology Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304364/2022
- Decision date
- 12 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms C M Baggs, Ms F Tankard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Kaggwa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a Systems Engineer, alleged direct race discrimination and racial harassment arising from work allocation, investigation and absence processes, commissioning work, training, grievance handling and a return-to-work meeting. The tribunal accepted that the claimant identified as black, but found that the respondent had a proper distinction between preventative and corrective maintenance teams and that the claimant's predominant periodic inspection work followed from his team allocation.
The tribunal found that some events occurred, including Mr Lincoln's derogatory and disparaging comments during the failed commissioning work, the claimant's removal from future commissioning assignments, and shortcomings in the subsequent meeting. However, stepping back from the individual allegations, it found no material from which it could conclude that the claimant's treatment was because of, or related to, race, and dismissed the discrimination claims.
For constructive unfair dismissal, the tribunal found earlier conduct amounting to a fundamental breach of the duty of trust and confidence, namely Mr Lincoln's conduct on the commissioning day taken alone or with the respondent's mediation meeting. It held that the claimant waived or affirmed that breach by remaining employed for about eight or nine months, and that the later return-to-work meeting was not a breach or last straw, so the resignation did not amount to constructive dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination was dismissed. The tribunal found no material from which it could conclude that the claimant's treatment was because of race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Racial harassment was dismissed. The tribunal found no material from which it could conclude that the treatment was related to race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The tribunal found earlier conduct amounting to a fundamental breach, but held that the claimant waived or affirmed the breach by remaining employed for about eight or nine months and that there was no later breach or last straw. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
12 references- s.13(1) Equality Act 2010
- s.23(1) Equality Act 2010
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
- Madarassy v Nomura International plc
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
- s.26(1) Equality Act 2010
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Omilaju v Waltham Forest London Borough Council
- Tullett Prebon plc v BGC Brokers LP
- WA Goold (Pearmak) Ltd v McConnell
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.