Case 3304545/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Drake v Clarion Housing Group Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304545/2020
- Decision date
- 6 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Drake
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was given after a remote preliminary hearing by Cloud Video Platform on 15 March 2021 before Employment Judge K J Palmer sitting alone. The tribunal recorded that the hearing was held remotely during the pandemic and that the parties had not objected to that format.
The tribunal set aside the Rule 21 default judgment against Clarion Housing Group. It also extended time so as to validate the respondent's ET3, which had been sent to the tribunal under cover of correspondence dated 16 February 2021.
The judgment did not determine the merits of the claimant's substantive claims and did not make any monetary award. The case was to be listed for a telephone closed preliminary hearing on 11 May 2021 for case management, following further and better particulars from the claimant, including directions and listing of a full merits hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment concerns a preliminary issue: the Rule 21 default judgment against the respondent was set aside and time was extended to validate the respondent's ET3. It does not adjudicate the substantive claims listed for the case. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.