Case 3304558/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Amankwah v North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304558/2022
- Decision date
- 25 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Ms J Costley, Ms S Laurence-Doig
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Amankwah
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford Employment Tribunal, Mr F Amankwah’s claims against North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust were heard on 5, 6, 7 and 8 February 2024 and 7 and 8 March 2024 before Employment Judge Park sitting with lay members Ms J Costley and Ms S Laurence-Doig. The judgment records three disability-related complaints: failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability, and harassment on the grounds of disability.
The tribunal dismissed all three claims. It found that the claim that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments failed, the claim for discrimination arising out of disability failed, and the claim for harassment on the grounds of disability failed. The written judgment does not record any award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for discrimination arising out of a disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Claim for harassment on the grounds of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.