Case 3304954/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Behera v Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304954/2023
- Decision date
- 14 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Behera
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr R Behera's claim against Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust. The judgment records that, by an order dated 19 October 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated reasons for the proposed strike out were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 19 September 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
No remedy was awarded or addressed in the judgment. The judgment does not record any lay panel members or any named legal test.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 19 September 2023 and the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment text does not set out separate reasoning for this claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 19 September 2023 and the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment text does not set out separate reasoning for this claim type. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 19 September 2023 and the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment text does not set out separate reasoning for this claim type. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.