Case 3305065/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Dumbrovskis v Dr Rubbish Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305065/2022
- Decision date
- 21 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Dumbrovskis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim and claims described as race or religious discrimination were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not set out any contested findings on those withdrawn claims beyond recording that they were no longer pursued.
The tribunal then made a determination under rule 21 in relation to the remaining money claims. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £950 gross.
It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,000. No separate award for injury to feelings, interest, or other heads of loss is recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment says this claim was 'dismissed on withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment refers to 'race or religious discrimination' being 'dismissed on withdrawal'; extracted separately as a race discrimination claim. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment refers to 'race or religious discrimination' being 'dismissed on withdrawal'; extracted separately as a religion or belief discrimination claim. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions from wages and was ordered to pay £950 gross. | Upheld | — | £950 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,000. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,950
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.