Case 3305094/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Irish v West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305094/2023
- Decision date
- 28 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr D Bean, Mrs J Hancock
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Irish
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked as a Distribution or Delivery Officer and was dismissed after a period of long-term sickness absence following an injury at work. The tribunal found that the principal reason for dismissal was capability due to long-term absence, and that the respondent acted within the band of reasonable responses after consulting the claimant, considering the medical position, and deciding it could not reasonably be expected to wait longer.
The tribunal found that the claimant was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 from 25 August 2022 because of impairments to his hands and wrists, and that the respondent knew or should have known of that disability from that date. It did not find the other relied-on impairments established as disabilities for the relevant purposes.
The direct disability discrimination complaint failed because the tribunal found no less favourable treatment because of disability. The discrimination arising from disability complaint failed because, although the later sickness absence arose from disability, the tribunal found the dismissal was because the claimant was or would be unfit for work and, in any event, was a proportionate means of achieving the legitimate aim of maintaining staffing levels and employing people capable of working. The reasonable adjustments complaint failed because the further postponement and redeployment steps relied on were not steps it was reasonable to require in the circumstances.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was presented in time but was not well founded; the tribunal found the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- band of reasonable responses test
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
- s.20 Equality Act 2010
- s.21 Equality Act 2010
- Project Management Institute v Latif
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.