Case 3305103/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Jeffery (administrator) on behalf of the estate of Sarah-Jane Jeffery v John Lewis plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305103/2023
- Decision date
- 6 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Jeffery (administrator) on behalf of the estate of Sarah-Jane Jeffery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, as administrator of his late sister's estate, pursued a disability discrimination complaint alleging failure to make reasonable adjustments. At the preliminary hearing the claim was clarified as concerning the respondent's sickness absence management procedure, including fit-note requirements, and proposed adjustments such as contacting the claimant, attempting home contact, using kinder correspondence, seeking expert advice, and extending disciplinary trigger points.
The tribunal held that the first claim had previously been dismissed as a nullity because it was presented before the claimant had standing as administrator. The second claim was presented nearly one year late, but the tribunal found that while some initial delay was blameworthy, the claimant's failure to present a protective second claim before the first was dismissed was understandable given the technical issue of standing.
The tribunal found little evidence that the respondent would be prejudiced by the delay, while refusal to extend time would leave the claimant with no claim. It therefore decided that the claim should not be struck out and that it was just and equitable to extend time for presentation of the claim to 3 May 2023. No finding was made on the substantive reasonable-adjustments complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary judgment only. The tribunal clarified the claim as a failure to make reasonable adjustments and decided that it was not struck out and that time should be extended under section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010. The substantive merits and remedy were not determined. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- British Coal Corpn v Keeble
- Southwark London Borough Council v Afolabi
- Rathakrishnan v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Ltd
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre t/a Leisure Link
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan
- Hendricks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.