Case 3305137/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Saira Ahmad v Explore Learning Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3305137/2020
- Decision date
- 12 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Saira Ahmad
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims of age discrimination, age-related harassment and victimisation against Ms Shivani Vyas. The tribunal found that the last allegation against Ms Vyas related to an incident on 18 December 2019 and that Ms Vyas ceased to be the claimant's line manager on or before 2 January 2020. On that basis, the three-month time limit expired by 17 March 2020, or at the latest 1 April 2020, but the claim form was not presented until 29 May 2020.
The tribunal considered whether it was just and equitable to extend time and refused to do so. It accepted that the claimant said she only learned of three allegations on 12 February 2020, but found that most of her complaints about Ms Vyas were already known by December 2019. The claimant had contacted ACAS in December 2019 and had access to legal advice in January 2020.
The tribunal also rejected the claimant's reliance on health issues and her asserted lack of knowledge that an individual could be named as a respondent. It found that her health issues did not prevent her from progressing her claim against the respondent, that she could have brought claims against Ms Vyas alongside that process, and that her ignorance of the ability to sue an individual was not a good reason for delay. The tribunal noted that she made a formal grievance about Ms Vyas in March 2020, found the delay significant, and struck out the claims against Ms Vyas as out of time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Claims against Ms Shivani Vyas were found to be out of time; the tribunal refused to extend time on a just and equitable basis. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Harassment | Harassment claim against Ms Shivani Vyas was struck out because the tribunal found it was presented out of time and declined to extend time. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim against Ms Shivani Vyas was struck out because the tribunal found it was presented out of time and declined to extend time. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- just and equitable test
- Robertson v Bexley Community Care, t/as Leisure Link
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.