Case 3305162/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Aaryan v Verizon UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3305162/2018
- Decision date
- 13 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mrs J Wood, Mr P Miller
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Aaryan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading Employment Tribunal from 10 to 13 February 2020 before Employment Judge George, with Mrs J Wood and Mr P Miller sitting as lay members. The claimant was Mr R Aaryan and the respondent was Verizon UK Limited. The written record states that the tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing.
The judgment records that all claims of direct discrimination on grounds of race were dismissed, all claims of direct discrimination on grounds of religion were dismissed, all claims of race-related harassment were dismissed, and all claims of religious harassment were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no separate remedy findings are set out in the written record provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.