Case 3305279/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Employment tribunal upholds holiday-pay claim against Mick George Ltd
The tribunal found that Mick George Ltd had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. The judgment records that the respondent had not responded, and on that basis the tribunal made an order for payment of £2,795.52.
- Case reference
- 3305279/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Fletcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Regional Employment Judge Foxwell. The tribunal found that Mick George Ltd had failed to pay Mr I Fletcher's holiday entitlement.
The judgment records that the respondent had not responded, and on that basis the tribunal made an order for payment of £2,795.52. No separate heads of loss, statutory uplift, or interest are identified in the extracted text.
The case was determined as a holiday entitlement / holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations listing category. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other employment claims are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,795.52. | Upheld | — | £2,796 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,796
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.