Case 3305331/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Enogiomwan v Complete Restaurant Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305331/2024
- Decision date
- 25 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Enogiomwan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 18 March 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr D Enogiomwan an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why his claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 17 January 2025 requiring him to qualify the claim, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying employment claims. It simply states that the claim is struck out, and the reasons identify procedural non-compliance and lack of active pursuit as the basis for that outcome. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Hutchings and dated 14 April 2025, and sent to the parties on 25 April 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant was given an opportunity by letter dated 18 March 2025 to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order of 17 January 2025 to qualify the claim and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.