Case 3305337/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Brockwell v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305337/2020
- Decision date
- 26 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Brockwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant's complaints of direct discrimination on the grounds of sex and age, and her harassment complaint, were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013. No findings on the merits of those claims are set out in this judgment.
The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claims would proceed. It is therefore a procedural disposal of the three listed complaints only, rather than a substantive liability decision or remedy judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the complaint was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.