Mr A Keech v JTalk Limited — 2025

Case reference: 3305392/2024
Decision date: 27 October 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Margo
Panel members: Mrs A Buck, Mr C Grant

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Keech

Respondent

JTalk Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal sat at Norwich by CVP on 8 to 10 October 2025 before Employment Judge Margo, Mrs A Buck and Mr C Grant. The judgment records that the claimant’s claims of constructive unfair dismissal, failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, and harassment were dismissed.

The published extract does not set out further reasons or any monetary award. The judgment was approved on 10 October 2025 and sent to the parties on 27 October 2025.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	The judgment describes this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal.	Dismissed	—	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment records a claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment records a claim of discrimination under s.15 of the Equality Act 2010.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Harassment	The judgment records a harassment claim within the disability discrimination case.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.