Case 3305624/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Ms T Exton v North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust — 2019

Case reference: 3305624/2018
Decision date: 10 October 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Foxwell Members
Venue: Cambridge County Court
Panel members: Mrs C Smith, Mr C Davie

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms T Exton

Respondent

North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal held that Ms T Exton's claim of disability discrimination by failure to make a reasonable adjustment under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 was not well-founded and was dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were provided in the judgment extract beyond the formal disposal.

The tribunal also found that Ms Exton was constructively and unfairly dismissed by North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust. This judgment determined liability only. The remedy was not decided at this stage and was listed for a hearing on 10 October 2019, with no award figure recorded in the extract.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Claim for disability discrimination by failure to make a reasonable adjustment contrary to sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010; held not well-founded and dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Unfair dismissal	Tribunal found that the claimant was constructively and unfairly dismissed by the respondent; remedy was left to a later hearing on 10 October 2019.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.