Case 3305641/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Brandon Sullivan v Care UK Community Partnerships Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305641/2020
- Decision date
- 9 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dobbie Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Brandon Sullivan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant resigned from his employment contract by email on 29 August 2019 so that he could move to Bank work while studying. The tribunal found the resignation was clear and unequivocal notice terminating the employment contract by 27 September 2019, was not given in the heat of the moment, and was not withdrawn.
From 28 September 2019 the claimant worked under a separate worker contract for Bank shifts, although he had not agreed the full written Bank contract. The tribunal found the essential terms were sufficiently agreed: he would select shifts through the respondent's app, attend booked shifts, and be paid at the Bank worker rate. There was no obligation on the respondent to provide work and no obligation on the claimant to accept it.
The tribunal found that the respondent's miscommunication, administrative errors and later mischaracterisation of the claimant's status caused confusion and frustration, but did not alter the legal position. Because the claimant was no longer an employee after 27 September 2019 and was only entitled to be paid for Bank shifts booked and worked, and he did no work after 7 October 2019, the arrears of pay claim was dismissed. The holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal after it was agreed there was no outstanding liability for holiday pay. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The arrears of pay and other payments claims were treated as the same claim for salaried pay for contractual hours from 8 October 2019 to the appeal outcome. The tribunal considered the claim by reference to entitlement to pay and noted the possible s.13 ERA route. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The same salaried pay claim was also addressed as a possible breach of contract claim, but the tribunal found the claimant's employment contract had ended on 27 September 2019 and no salaried pay was due thereafter. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Riordan v War Office [1961] 1 WLR 210
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.