Case 3305815/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kiyani in person For the v Project Re Ltd. (previously known as Glife Food Ltd. and Seasons Re Ltd.) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305815/2021
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kiyani in person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Reading on 12 May 2022, Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby, sitting alone, determined Mr Imran Kiyani's claim that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from his wages. The respondent did not appear, and the written judgment records that the deduction was admitted by the respondent.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered Project Re Ltd, formerly known as Seasons Re Ltd and as Glife Food Ltd, to pay Mr Kiyani the gross sum of £4,453.85, being the amount claimed. The judgment does not record any separate apportionment of the award beyond that gross sum.
The decision notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided unless requested within 14 days. No additional legal tests, findings, or remedies are recorded in the written judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent admitted the claim. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum claimed. | Upheld | — | £4,454 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,454
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.