Case 3305966/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Parveen v Hertfordshire Community NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305966/2022
- Decision date
- 30 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Ms B Robinson, Ms L Thompson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Parveen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that, at the relevant times, Ms R Parveen was not a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 because of back pain, stress and anxiety, or a combination of both. On that basis, the complaints alleging a failure to make reasonable adjustments failed and were dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed all complaints alleging direct discrimination because of race and because of religion, together with all complaints alleging harassment related to race and religion. The judgment records those heads of claim as having failed in full.
In addition, the tribunal dismissed the complaints alleging harassment related to the disability of a family member and direct discrimination because of the disability of a family member. As all complaints failed, the claimant was not entitled to any remedy, and it was not necessary to make decisions on time limit issues.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint alleging failure to make reasonable adjustments. The tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 because of back pain, stress and anxiety, or a combination of both. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | All complaints alleging direct discrimination because of race were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | All complaints alleging direct discrimination because of religion were dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | All complaints alleging harassment related to race were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | All complaints alleging harassment related to religion were dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | All complaints alleging harassment related to the disability of a family member were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.