Case 3306052/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Rabdiya v Marshall Eaton Holdings Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306052/2023
- Decision date
- 28 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Rabdiya
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded. It found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for the period 1 December 2022 to 1 February 2023 and ordered payment of a gross sum of £18,249.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay and ordered payment of £1,403.77 gross. The holiday pay complaint succeeded because the respondent failed to pay for holiday accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended, and the tribunal ordered payment of £1,824.90 gross.
The employer's contract claim failed and was dismissed. The judgment records that the claimant must return any retained respondent property, with the parties to make arrangements for this.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross sum awarded for unauthorised deduction from wages in the period 1 December 2022 to 1 February 2023. | Upheld | — | £18,249 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim succeeded. | Upheld | — | £1,404 |
| Holiday pay | Gross sum awarded for accrued but untaken holiday on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,825 |
| Breach of contract | The employer's contract claim failed and was dismissed; the judgment records that the claimant must return any retained respondent property. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,478
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.