Case 3306056/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Self-representing (in Reading ET) For the v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306056/2022
- Decision date
- 29 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Self-representing (in Reading ET) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Reading on 26 February 2024 before Employment Judge George, the Respondent applied to strike out the claims under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The Claimant was self-representing and the Respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the Respondent's strike-out application. The written judgment records only that outcome and does not set out substantive findings on the underlying claims.
The judgment also records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note appended to the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Respondent's application for the claims to be struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 was dismissed. The judgment does not determine the underlying claims on their merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.