Case 3306336/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Bateman v Arriva The Shires Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3306336/2020
- Decision date
- 2 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Bateman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because no response had been received from the respondent. On the claim as presented, Mr C Bateman succeeded in his claim that he had suffered unlawful deductions from wages.
The judgment records the unlawful deductions as being in the gross sum of £3,980. No further reasoning, split of award, or additional remedy components are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under Rule 21 because no response was received from the respondent. | Upheld | — | £3,980 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,980
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.