Case 3306439/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Payne v DHL Services Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3306439/2024
- Decision date
- 22 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Margo Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Payne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R Payne, brought claims against DHL Services Limited. The judgment records claims of unfair dismissal, automatic unfair dismissal contrary to s.152 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and detriment claims under s.146 of that Act.
The tribunal dismissed all of those claims. The judgment is short and does not set out reasons, remedy findings, monetary awards, or any named legal tests applied.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Trade union | The judgment states that the automatic unfair dismissal claim contrary to s.152 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Trade union | The judgment states that detriment claims under s.146 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.